Chitika Publishers Lose 30% Of Earnings To Auditing

A couple of months ago I asked polled readers about their Chitika eMiniMalls earnings to

find out what the average earnings were and what percentage of earnings they were

losing to auditing. A completely unscientific poll (I had to scrub the data to

remove duplicate/multiple votes) but here are the results.

Average Earnings

So how much money do Chitika Chitika publishers make, before auditing, on a monthly

basis?

  • Less than $10: 4%
  • $10 to $20: 14%
  • $20 to $50: 14%
  • $50 to $100: 9%
  • $100 to $250: 12%
  • $250 to $500: 18%
  • $500 or more: 29%

Surprisingly, almost 30% of those polled make $500 or more a month from

Chitika, and almost half make at least $250 a month. Even after auditing (see

below), half would make at least $150 a month, and I suspect a good 10% to 20% would make over $500 a month.

Average Percentage Lost to Auditing

What percentage of a publisher’s monthly earnings are lost due to auditing?

  • Less than 10%: 8%
  • 10% to 20%: 13%
  • 20% to 30%: 35%
  • 30% to 40%: 16%
  • 40% to 50%: 24%
  • 50% to 60%: 3%
  • 60% to 70%: 0
  • 70% to 80%: 0
  • 80% to 90%: 0
  • 90% to 100%: 1%

Chitika’s auditing practices for eMiniMalls brought them a lot of grief early

on, and they’re still somewhat controversial. Over half the publishers lose up to

30% of their monthly earnings after auditing and 40% of them lose between 30% and

60% of their earnings. So a 30% loss in earnings is probably a good estimate for

new publishers for the first few months until a pattern emerges.

Suggestions for Improvement

The poll allowed voters to suggest improvements to the eMiniMalls program. Not

suprisingly, the majority voted for same-day auditing of data, just like AdSense

does. Another large group wanted same-day auditing plus more powerful reporting

capabilities — eMiniMalls reporting is definitely less sophisticated than

what AdSense publishers are used to.

Originally from An AdSense Blog: Make Easy Money with Google on July 20, 2006, 6:42pm

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.